Clive Dilnot writes about how practice can become knowledge-productive if we follow a two-step process of enactment (practice), plus critical reflection. He refers to this second stage as an analytical translation of enacted practice into knowledge. Yet I wonder whether in my experience so far I haven’t worked through three stages. The first two stages [...]
The panellists comments that came from this review exposed the confusion that comes from the circularity embedded within my topic. Given that I am presenting my current research, by exploring the presentation/dissemination of my previous research…it often becomes unclear where my current PhD topic begins and my old Masters research ends. This is further amplified [...]
Clive Dilnot writes about how although the sciences might number the world and the humanities might narrate it, what they have in common is a predisposition to describe it. Whereas he makes the distinction that design is less concerned with describing ‘what is’, and more interested in proposing ‘what if’?
Given that academic literature on [...]